BY: GRACE MAGLIETTA | JUNE 29, 2022
You may be thinking: Politics polarize. Sports unite. What could the two possibly have to do with each other? As it turns out, plenty. Sports and politics have been always been tangled up with each other:
Even with all the ways sports and politics are intertwined, borrowing from each other and using each other, the relationship between them is often one-sided. In other words, in American culture it’s fine when politicians touch sports, when they use it for political gain. For athletes, however, it’s a different story. Athletes can’t touch politics, and when they do, they’re considered out of their expertise.
In a critique of NBA players Lebron James and Kevin Durant’s critique of then President Trump on the UNINTERRUPTED podcast, FOX News pundit Laura Ingraham summed up the imbalance, arguing athletes should “Shut up and dribble.” It’s not really common to hear the other side: “Shut up and pundit,” for instance, if a politician talks about sports.
The imbalance becomes even more clear when considering presidential visits: it’s not considered a political act for the president to invite a sports team to the White House, so why is it when an athlete declines the invitation? And why is Colin Kaepernick’s decision to take a knee during the national anthem “too political” when the NFL’s militaristic patriotism is not?
Whoever you’re rooting for, it’s time to level the playing field and acknowledge that sports and politics don’t have to be on opposing teams. It’s important to remember this history. Politicians and athletes alike have never kept their politics “off the field.” The idea of “shutting up” or “staying in one’s lane” is myth of American culture that forecloses argument and limits who gets to speak up, speak out, and speak for.